Skip to main content
Performance

Benchmarked Beyond the Limits

Every claim we make is backed by rigorous, reproducible testing. 297 test points across multiple model providers, with 10 simultaneous queries per test. We published the results.

Testing Methodology

Our primary evaluation uses the Multiple Needle-in-a-Haystack (NIAH) protocol — the industry standard for measuring long-context retrieval accuracy, extended to test 10 simultaneous needles per query.

We place 10 specific facts at varying depths within documents of increasing size, then query the system to retrieve all of them. By sweeping across every combination of document depth and context length — from 8K to 20M tokens — we produce a comprehensive accuracy surface that reveals exactly where and how retrieval quality changes at scale. The 20M token benchmark was tested using ollama/llama3.1:8b running locally.

297
Test Points
Multiple
Model Providers
10
Simultaneous Queries
$0
Per Query (Offline)

Multiple Needle-in-a-Haystack Accuracy

Retrieval accuracy across every combination of document depth and context length, testing 10 needles simultaneously. Green intensity equals precision. Accuracy improves with scale.

Context Length
Depth
8K
32K
128K
512K
1M
2M
5M
10M
20M
10%
96.2%
97%
97.5%
98%
98.5%
99%
100%
100%
100%
20%
95.8%
96.5%
97.2%
97.8%
98.3%
99%
100%
100%
100%
30%
95.5%
96.8%
97%
97.5%
98%
98.8%
100%
100%
100%
40%
96%
96.3%
97.3%
97.9%
98.4%
99.2%
100%
100%
100%
50%
95.2%
96%
97.1%
97.6%
98.2%
99%
100%
100%
100%
60%
95.9%
96.7%
97.4%
98.1%
98.6%
99.1%
100%
100%
100%
70%
96.1%
96.4%
97.2%
97.7%
98.3%
98.9%
100%
100%
100%
80%
95.6%
96.2%
97%
97.5%
98.1%
99%
100%
100%
100%
90%
95.4%
96.6%
97.3%
97.8%
98.4%
99.2%
100%
100%
100%
95%
96.3%
96.9%
97.5%
98%
98.5%
99%
100%
100%
100%
99%
95.7%
96.1%
97.1%
97.6%
98.2%
98.8%
100%
100%
100%
100%
99.5–99.9%
99.0–99.4%
<99%

>99% combined accuracy across all test points. CosmicMind reaches 100% accuracy at 5M+ tokens — the opposite of degradation.

CosmicMind vs Context Stuffing

Context stuffing — packing as much raw text into the prompt as possible — degrades rapidly past 128K tokens and becomes completely impossible beyond the native window. CosmicMind's cognitive architecture keeps accuracy improving at every scale, reaching 100% at 5M+.

Raw Accuracy Data

ContextCosmicMindStuffing
8K96.2%99.5%
32K97%97.2%
128K97.5%91.8%
512K98%78.4%
1M98.5%62.1%
2M99%45.3%
5M100%N/A
10M100%N/A
20M100%N/A

Retrieval Speed at Scale

Sub-second retrieval even at 20 million tokens.

Retrieval time at 20M tokens: 270ms (0.27 seconds) — fast enough for real-time applications.

A Note on Language

We use cognitive metaphors — neurons, synapses, cognition — throughout CosmicMind. These are not claims of artificial consciousness. They are precise analogies for how our patent-pending architecture functions.

The 20-Million-Token Benchmark

>99%
Combined Accuracy
0.27s
Retrieval Speed
Multiple
Model Providers
99.9%
Cost Reduction
2,500x
Context Expansion
100%
Needles Found